|
Illinois Personal Injury Defense Law: Products Liability
Personal Injury Defense Law: Products Liability
A common kind of personal injury lawsuit is one that
results from an injury caused by a defective product.
Products liability lawsuits require the plaintiff to
prove that a product was defective and that the defect
was the principal cause of the plaintiff's injury.
This section describes the most important principles
of law governing products liability cases.
Kinds of Defects
Products liability lawsuits typically allege one or
more of three kinds of defectsdefective warning, design
defect, and manufacturing defect. Often, a single lawsuit
will allege all three theories.
Defective Warning
A manufacturer has a duty to provide adequate instructions
concerning the safe use of its product and must warn
buyers of any dangers associated with the product.
If such warnings are not present, the manufacturer
may be liable for injuries caused by the product. Manufacturers
therefore have a duty to perform safety tests to determine
what warning labels need to be put on a product. These
tests should simulate conditions under which the product
would ordinarily be used. For example, the manufacturer
of a hand-held electric hair dryer must anticipate
that its product might be used above a sink full of
water and therefore must warn buyers that dropping
the product in water may lead to electrocution. However,
a warning label need not be put on an obviously dangerous
product, such as a kitchen knife.
Included in the duty to warn is a duty to provide post-sale
information. Under Illinois law, a manufacturer must
warn consumers of hazards associated with a product
discovered after a product has been sold. A manufacturer
also may be required to recall products in which defects
have been discovered and to redesign the products to
make them safe. In Illinois, these are continual obligations
of manufacturers. In other words, a manufacturer must
warn consumers about, and possibly recall, an unsafe
product, even if the manufacturer stopped making it
many years ago.
Design Defect
Sometimes products are built exactly as designed, but
are dangerous because of poor engineering, inadequate
testing or poor choice of construction materials. A
manufacturer is negligent if it fails to take reasonable
care to ensure that a product is designed to perform
safely. Not only must companies make sure their products
are safe when they are used in the intended way, but
also in unintended, though foreseeable, ways. If a
manufacturer cannot eliminate a danger from a product,
or install a guard to protect a user from the danger,
then the manufacturer must warn the user of the danger.
Most products liability cases attempt to prove that
a design defect caused an injury.
Manufacturing Defect
This type of defect occurs when a product is designed
well, but through a flaw in the manufacturing process,
fails to meet the specifications contained in the design.
For example, even if a motorcycle manufacturer ordinarily
makes a well-designed gasoline tank for its motorcycles,
if it makes a leaking one that causes a fire, then
the manufacturer could be liable for injuries caused
by that defect.
Types of Products Liability Claims
Most often, products liability lawsuits are brought
under one or more of three theoriesstrict liability,
negligence, and wrongful death. Knowing which theory
a plaintiff is pursuing in a particular case is important
because each theory applies different standards and
has a different statute of limitations.
Strict Liability
Strict liability holds a manufacturer liable for injuries
sustained by a person using its product, if the product
is found to be unreasonably dangerous. Under Illinois
law, a plaintiff pursuing a claim for strict liability
must prove that a product was defective and unreasonably
dangerous, that the defect was present while the product
was still in the manufacturer's control, and that the
defect caused the injury. The statute of limitations
in Illinois for products liability lawsuits based on
strict liability is two years from the date of the
injury.
Negligence
Products liability lawsuits can allege negligence when
a manufacturer fails to exercise the care that would
be exercised by a reasonable manufacturer in the same
or similar situation. Whereas strict liability focuses
on the manufactured product, negligence theory focuses
on the conduct of the manufacturer. A manufacturer
who implements very strict production controls designed
to ensure that products are made properly may be able
to avoid committing a negligence tort because all due
care was taken that reasonably could be expected.
Illinois, like some other states, has laws that under
certain conditions allow a plaintiff to collect damages
from companies that distribute or sell defective products,
even if the company did not design, test, or manufacture
the product. If distributors or sellers knew that a
product was defective but did nothing to keep it from
reaching consumers, they could be held liable for damages.
In addition, a distributor who damages a product can
be held liable for any injuries this causes, and a
retailer who incorrectly assembles or installs a product
also can be sued. The statute of limitations in Illinois
for products liability lawsuits based on negligence
is typically two years from the date of the injury.
Alabama
|
Alaska
|
Arizona
|
Arkansas
|
California
|
Colorado
|
Connecticut
|
Delaware
|
District of Columbia
|
Florida
|
Georgia
|
Hawaii
|
Idaho
|
Illinois
|
Indiana
|
Iowa
|
Kansas
|
Kentucky
|
Louisiana
|
Maine
|
Maryland
|
Massachusetts
|
Michigan
|
Minnesota
|
Mississippi
|
Missouri
|
Montana
|
Nebraska
|
Nevada
|
New Hampshire
|
New Jersey
|
New Mexico
|
New York
|
North Carolina
|
North Dakota
|
Ohio
|
Oklahoma
|
Oregon
|
Pennsylvania
|
Rhode Island
|
South Carolina
|
South Dakota
|
Tennessee
|
Texas
|
Utah
|
Vermont
|
Virginia
|
Washington
|
West Virginia
|
Wisconsin
|
Wyoming
|
|