|
Minnesota Law |
|
|
Minnesota Publicly Held Corporations Law
Publicly Held Corporations LawThere is no definitive line that separates a publicly held corporation from a closely held corporation. For certain limited purposes, the Minnesota Business Corporations Act defines a closely held corporation as a corporation with 35 or fewer shareholders. The Minnesota's Workers' Compensation Act defines a closely held corporation as a corporation whose stock is held by no more than 10 persons. In addition, federal law requires that publicly held corporations with more than $5,000,000 in assets and whose outstanding securities are held by more than 500 shareholders of record must meet several unique requirements of the Federal Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, including a requirement to submit periodic financial information to the Securities and Exchange Commission. This chapter discusses how to form a publicly held corporation, the advantages and disadvantages of corporate status, and mergers and acquisitions. The Small & Privately Held Business Law Chapter discusses other ways to organize a business and addresses issues uniquely of concern to closely held corporations. The Associations & Nonprofit Law Chapter discusses how to form a nonprofit, tax-exempt corporation. The Securities & Venture Finance Law Chapter discusses securities laws and regulations that affect most publicly held corporations.
Forming a Publicly Held Corporation
SurvivabilityOne advantage is that because a corporation is an artificial person, its existence does not depend on who its owners are at any given time. A corporation can survive the death of an individual shareholder or director or the transfer of shares. The corporation "dies" only when it is dissolved, either voluntarily or involuntarily. The ability to survive the death or departure of any individual person gives the corporation stability and makes it a more attractive candidate for long-term financing. Survivability also permits the corporation to raise funds by selling shares to new investors because new owners can be added without disturbing the corporate form.
Shareholder Insulation from Debt and LiabilityA corporation is liable for its own debts and obligations without limit, but because the corporation can take out loans and be sued in its own name, the shareholders are not personally liable for those debts should the corporation be unable to pay. Absent an agreement to the contrary, a corporation's creditors may not seek to collect debts from the owners of the corporation. In legalese, the shareholders enjoy "limited liability." Limited liability makes investment in a corporation more attractive to potential investors because the most that can be lost is the initial investment.Incorporators of new corporations may not be able to enjoy limited liability immediately, however, because owners of a new corporation may be required by financial institutions to give personal financial assurances in order to receive funding. Financial institutions understand the risk they take by making loans to young corporations without established credit records and thus they may try to limit their exposure by requiring shareholders to personally guarantee loans should the corporation be unable to make payments. In addition to the possibility that financial institutions will require personal guarantees for loans to corporations, on rare occasions a court will ignore a business' corporate status and make its shareholders personally liable for the debts of a corporation. Disregarding corporate status is known as "piercing the corporate veil." In Minnesota, piercing the corporate veil is extremely rare. Minnesota courts use a two-prong test in deciding whether to pierce the corporate veil and ignore a corporation's corporate status. The first prong considers:
Centralized ManagementAnother benefit of corporate status is centralized management. The shareholders of a publicly held corporation are its owners, but management and control of the corporation are the responsibility of the board of directors, who may or may not be shareholders. In contrast, in a partnership, each partner has a right to participate in management.
Transferability of InterestShares of stock in a corporation may be freely bought, sold, assigned, or otherwise disposed of by their owners unless there are special circumstances. In contrast, partnership interests are not freely transferable without the permission of remaining partners. The free transferability of shares increases their value because investors know they will be able to sell the shares quickly and easily should they choose to do so.
Double TaxationThe biggest drawback of corporate status is double taxation. Most publicly held corporations file their own tax returns and pay taxes on corporate profits before paying dividends to the shareholders. When the shareholders receive the dividends, these profits will be taxed on the individual shareholders' tax returns. In contrast, the profits of a partnership are only taxed once because a partnership pays no taxes before distributing profits. Partners only pay taxes on their individual share of the profits.
CostGiven the more complex nature of organizing and running a corporation as compared to other forms of business organization, most corporations pay more for professional services from accountants and lawyers. In addition, the fees for incorporating are generally higher than fees for other forms of business organization. Finally, a corporation that sells securities faces very substantial costs to comply with a myriad of securities regulations.
InflexibilityAnother significant drawback to corporate status is the loss of flexibility in running a business. In order to avoid the possibility of a court piercing the corporate veil, a corporation needs to observe several formalities, such as regular meetings and elections. For some small businesses, the loss of flexibility may make corporate status more trouble than it is worth.
Articles of IncorporationThe MBCA allows corporations to have very simple articles of incorporation. Articles of incorporation need only include:
Name RegistrationMinnesota Statutes require that any business operating in Minnesota under a name other than the full name of the business owner must register the assumed name with the Minnesota Secretary of State. A "Certificate of Assumed Name" form is available from the Minnesota Secretary of State's office. The business owner must fill out the form and submit it and the accompanying fee to the Secretary of State. After the Secretary of State notifies the owner that the filing has been accepted and the proposed name does not conflict with corporate or partnership names on file, the owner must publish notice of the assumed name in a newspaper. The newspaper chosen must be in the county where the principal office of the business is located. The corporation's name registration is valid for ten years and can be renewed.
Tax Identification NumbersCorporations in Minnesota must obtain federal and state tax identification numbers. A corporation with employees must also register with the Minnesota Department of Jobs and Training for an Unemployment Compensation Insurance number. Businesses that sell goods or services that are taxable must obtain a sales and use tax permit from the Minnesota Department of Revenue.
Subchapter C CorporationMost large, publicly held corporations are Subchapter C corporations. The Subchapter C corporation takes its name from Subchapter C of the Internal Revenue Code. A Subchapter C corporation is subject to the general corporate taxation rules discussed above.
Subchapter S CorporationA Subchapter S corporation derives its name from Subchapter S of the Internal Revenue Code. Under Subchapter S, a corporation that meets certain requirements may be treated as a corporation for purposes of insulating its shareholders from personal liability for corporate debts, but treated as a partnership for tax purposes. Shareholders of a Subchapter S corporation receive limited liability protection, and their profits from the business are included on their individual income tax return. Minnesota has similar tax treatment for such corporations.To be treated as a Subchapter S corporation under federal tax laws, the corporation:
Minnesota Statutes require a director to "discharge the duties of the position of director in good faith, in a manner the director reasonably believes to be in the best interest of the corporation, and with the care an ordinarily prudent person in a like position would exercise under similar circumstances." Directors who perform their duties in compliance with the above standard are not liable for their actions merely by reason of being or having been a director of the corporation. Put another way, directors' decisions made honestly and with reasonable prudence do not subject a director to liability even if they turn out badly for the corporation.
Mergers and Acquisitions
Economies of scaleBy consolidating purchasing, advertising, and administrative functions, a larger, merged company often can be more efficient than two smaller companies.
Diversification and Access to AssetsA merger may give a company better access to credit and new products and may help to even out peaks and valleys in cash flow and profits.
Tax AdvantagesThe Internal Revenue Code provides some incentive for a financially healthy corporation to acquire a troubled business. If the acquiring corporation meets several strict requirements, it may be able to use a limited part of the net operating loss carryover of the acquired business against the acquiring company's taxable income.
Personal ConsiderationsAn owner looking to make assets more liquid, either out of retirement considerations or because of dissent within the company, may look to a sale or merger. Sometimes a business may be growing so quickly that its owners need the skills and resources of a competitor to keep up with the growth. In some instances an older, more stable company may be interested in sharing its experiences in exchange for the higher profit margins of a smaller, up-and-coming business.
Asset AcquisitionIn this method, a buyer will purchase some or all of the seller's assets in exchange for securities, cash or property of the acquiring corporation. If the seller is a corporation, the structure of the selling corporation will remain intact until the corporation is dissolved and the proceeds from the sale are distributed to shareholders. Minority shareholders will generally not have a say in the sale of the business and, as the buyer is not purchasing an entire business but rather parts of the whole, the buyer need not assume the liabilities of the seller. Asset acquisition is a way to acquire the physical property and accounts of another business without also acquiring its liabilities.Acquiring the assets of a business can be more expensive than other types of acquisitions or mergers. There may be some difficulty in transferring contracts, leases and licenses from third parties, and titles to each asset sold must be separately transferred.
Stock AcquisitionStock acquisitions are frequently called takeovers. A corporation's shareholders, not its management, own the company (although managers often are significant shareholders themselves). Thus, the shareholders are always free to sell their shares of stock to a purchaser. In the event that the management does not approve of the sale, the acquisition is called a hostile takeover.Under this arrangement, the directors' approval is not needed to purchase the corporation and the only documents that need to be transferred are stock certificates (rather than titles), contracts or any other form of consideration by third parties. There are a number of problems with takeovers. For example, the new majority shareholders may be liable for debts incurred under the old leadership prior to the purchase. In addition, the Securities and Exchange Commission may require registration for the sale, and minority shareholders may be able to hold out and retain positions within the acquired corporation.
Statutory MergerUnder a statutory merger, two corporations agree to combine and form a single corporation under state law. This arrangement must be agreed to by at least two-thirds of the shareholders from each corporation and by both boards of directors. Only one company survives, and it takes over all operations, assets, and liabilities of both companies. The shareholders of the disappearing corporation trade in their shares of stock for an equity position in the surviving business. In a related type of merger, called a statutory consolidation, the two businesses both cease to exist and form an entirely new entity.A statutory merger is beneficial because all title transfers are automatic if the arrangement follows state guidelines, and because all assets of both companies are retained in the merger. On the other hand, this type of arrangement runs the risk of assuming all liabilities of the disappearing corporation, and the process can be costly and time-consuming due to the necessity of shareholder meetings and the technicalities of state laws.
Employee ConsiderationsAn agreement should guarantee that key employees are retained and that contracts for employment are transferred to the buyer company. The buyer should review any collective bargaining agreements thoroughly, since they may be binding. Retirement plans will likely be transferred to the buyer company as well.
Seller IndemnificationIt is common for an agreement to dismiss the buyer from any future unassumed liabilities from an asset purchase.
Securities RegulationsA buyer of a business who offers securities in exchange for the business, or for significant shares of the business, may be considered an "issuer" of the securities and therefore may be required to register with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The buyer may, however, be eligible for exemption under the law. Determining whether a business must register and which kind of registration it must undertake can affect the sellers' ability to resell the securities they receive as payment. There are a number of other considerations under both federal securities laws and state blue-sky laws to be aware of in mergers and acquisitions that involve the exchange of stocks. The advice of a competent attorney is highly recommended.
Buyer-Seller RepresentationsThe buyer in a transaction in which the seller is being paid in stock will generally warrant that the stock is legal, authorized, and fully paid. The seller in the same type of exchange will warrant that the stock is legal, and will further note the condition of the business in financial documents.
ResourcesMinnesota Department of Revenue, Business Assistance Group, Mail Station 5555, St. Paul, MN 55146-5555, (651) 296-6181. Minnesota Secretary of State, 180 State Office Building, 100 Constitution Avenue, St. Paul, MN 55155-1299, (612) 296-2803. Minnesota Small Business Assistance Office, 500 Metro Square, 121 Seventh Place East, St. Paul, MN 55101-2146, (612) 296-3871 or 1-800-657-3858 (free pamphlet: A Guide to Starting a Business in Minnesota, 13th ed. 1995).
|